10 best UXtweak alternatives (often misspelled as UX Tweak) in 2024

With the ability to conduct moderated and unmoderated studies, from concepts to production,  effortless recruitment and management of participants, comprehensive analysis, and reports it became a strong contender in the market of user research tools. But what about alternatives to UXtweak and its competitors?

Which alternatives will we consider?

1. UserTesting
2. Userlytics
3. Maze
4. Lookback
5. Loop11
6. Dscout 
7. Trymata
8. Hotjar 
9. Userfeel 
10. Useberry

1. UserTesting

UserTesting allows organizations to collect customer insights during digital product development, using a global audience for feedback. However, researchers often criticize the platform for unreliable test participants, and its pricing is frequently seen as too high for small and medium-sized companies.

Source: UserTesting

UserTesting features

Strengths of UserTesting compared to UXtweak

• UserTesting has more intuitive and user-friendly use
• UserTesting University contains lots of courses and educational materials
  • UXtweak note: To address this, new tutorial videos are being produced and comprehensive redesign is on the roadmap.

Weaknesses of UserTesting compared to UXtweak

• UserTesting has respondent quality issues
• The platform is less stable during testing
• The price/performance ratio is lower than UXtweak
• Panel coverage is weaker outside the US

UserTesting pricing

UserTesting’s pricing is not publicly listed, but from the information we were able to find annual subscriptions start around $30,000 on the lower end, with the average user spending more than $50,000. Costs vary based on the number of seats and added features like User Panel credits and international team support.

UserTesting vs UXtweak reviews

UserTesting has a general rating of 4.5/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher at 4.8/5. 

2. Userlytics

Userlytics has been in the UX research market for 14 years, offering tools to run usability tests on websites, mobile apps, ads, and social media content. It helps businesses gain a deeper understanding of customer needs and emotions while also providing tools for information architecture research.

Source: Userlytics

Userlytics features

Strengths of Userlytics compared to UXtweak

• Userlytics offers Adobe XD integration

Weaknesses of Userlytics compared to UXtweak

• UXtweak lets you manage your own database of test participants, so you’re not solely dependent on the Panel, helping you avoid additional costs.
• Lack of analysis tools compared to UXtweak
• Technical issues with test initiation
• Struggles with remote moderated sessions (scheduling, limited participant visibility, and inflexible study setup)

Userlytics pricing

• Project Based: $69/session (max. 35 sessions)
• Enterprise: From $34/session (with annual plan and volume discounts)
• Limitless: Custom quote for unlimited accounts and test

Userlytics reviews

Userlytics has a general rating of 4.7/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher at 4.8/5.

3. Maze

Maze is a user research platform focused on delivering insights quickly to support product development. It’s designed for ease of use by designers, product managers, and researchers. However, researchers often report issues with prototype crashes, especially on mobile, and unreliable test participants who drop out or rush through tests.

Source: Maze

Maze features

Strengths of Maze compared to UXtweak

• Maze has integration with Sketch and Adobe XD

Weaknesses of Maze compared to UXtweak

• Respondent quality issues
• Unclear heat maps
• Prototype stability issues

Maze pricing

• Free plan offered
• Starter plan starting at $99/month
• Custom plans available for larger organizations

Maze reviews

Maze has a general rating of 4.5/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher at 4.8/5.

4. Lookback

Lookback is helpful for quick moderated or unmoderated tests, allowing UX researchers to assess user interaction with new product features. However, a key drawback is the lack of a user panel for participant recruitment, meaning teams must manage the cost and logistics themselves.

Source: Lookback

Lookback features

Strengths of Lookback compared to UXtweak

• Lookback provides AI-powered qualitative research tools.

Weaknesses of Lookback compared to UXtweak

• No built-in tester pool compared to UXtweak
• Requires a Google Chrome plugin
• Issues with session visibility and interaction
• Frequent connection drops during sessions

Lookback pricing

• Freelance: $300/year, 10 sessions, core features, and 24/7 support.
• Team: $1,788/year, 100 sessions, unlimited collaborators, and 24/7 support.
• Insights Hub: $4,128/year, 300 sessions, priority support, and security features.
• Enterprise: Custom pricing, unlimited sessions, dedicated support, and team demo.

Lookback reviews

Lookback has a general rating of 3.4/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher at 4.8/5.

5. Loop11

Loop11 is a UX research platform that automates user testing to improve digital experiences. It allows users to run tests on websites, prototypes, or competitor sites across all devices. However, compared to UXtweak, Loop11 has limitations such as a less flexible pricing model, or fewer advanced features for more complex research needs.

Source: Loop11

Loop11 features

• User interviews
• Website usability testing
• Mobile apps testing
• Prototype testing

Strengths of Loop11 compared to UXtweak

• Loop11 offers Slack Integration

Weaknesses of Loop11 compared to UXtweak

• Limited pricing flexibility compared to UXtweak
• Loop11 lacks advanced features
• Users experience minor lags during usage

Loop11 pricing

• Rapid Insights: $179/month (annual) or $199/month, for quick insights on small projects.
• Pro: $358/month (annual) or $399/month, for larger teams with up to 10 projects/month.
• Enterprise: $533/month (annual) or $599/month, for unlimited projects, participants, and advanced features.

Loop11 reviews

Loop11 has a rating of 3.6/5 on G2 and 4.5/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher with 4.7/5 on G2 and 4.8/5 on Capterra.

6. dscout

dscout is a remote research platform that helps gather in-the-moment user insights through video interviews and multimedia data. It offers access to a participant pool of over 100,000 for real-time feedback. 

dscout features

• Moderated testing
• Prototype testing
• Website testing
• Surveys

Strengths of dscout Compared to UXtweak

• dscout offers Slack integration

Weaknesses of dscout Compared to UXtweak

• dscout struggles to find niche audiences
• It has a worse price-quality ratio compared to UXtweak
• Response options are more restrictive than those available in UXtweak

dscout pricing

dscout does not publicly share its pricing. To inquire about costs, you’ll need to contact their sales team.

dscout reviews

dscout has a general rating of 4.5/5 on G2, while UXtweak scores higher at 4.7/5.

7. Trymata (formerly TryMyUI)

Trymata supports usability testing across all platforms and stages of product development. You can use your own users or have TryMyUI recruit and screen participants. Despite being a strong choice, see below for limitations that UXtweak overcomes, making it a potentially better fit for you.

Source: Trymata

Trymata features

Strengths of Trymata Compared to UXtweak

• Trymata offers automated user testing data tagging

Weaknesses of Trymata Compared to UXtweak

• Limited to a single attempt for testing/feedback, while UXtweak allows adjustments and corrections of your study
• Faces technical and data accessibility issues
• Has a worse price-quality ratio compared to UXtweak

Trymata pricing

• Team: Starts at $333/month, designed for medium-sized teams with limited features.
• Enterprise: Starts at $1,667/month, for large teams with advanced features.
• Unlimited: Offers unlimited seats and testers, tailored for large-scale testing.
• Agency: Custom pricing, tailored for large teams with specific needs.

Trymata reviews

Trymata has a general rating of 3.8/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher at 4.8/5.

8. Hotjar

Hotjar offers basic user analytics tools like heatmaps, session recordings, and conversion funnels to help track user behavior. It provides useful insights but comes with higher pricing and limited data storage depending on the plan. While it’s a popular tool, it lacks some of the depth and flexibility found in UXtweak.

Source: Hotjar

Hotjar features

• Heatmaps 
• Screen Recordings
• Feedback Widgets
• Surveys 
• Live interviews 

Strengths of Hotjar compared to UXtweak

• Hotjar has integrations with platforms such as Hubspot, Google Analytics or WordPress

Weaknesses of Hotjar compared to UXtweak

• Hotjar’s business plans are more expensive, exceeding $1000/month
• It can slow down website performance
• Its dashboard is more confusing to navigate compared to UXtweak

Hotjar pricing

• Basic (€0): 35 daily sessions, heatmaps, and HubSpot integration.
• Plus (€32): 100 sessions, data filtering, and event tracking.
• Business (€80): 500 sessions, custom integrations, and user tracking.
• Scale (€171): 500 sessions, funnels, API access, and dedicated support.

Prices increase if additional features or more sessions are required.

Hotjar reviews

Hotjar has a general rating of 4.7/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher – at 4.8/5. 

9. Userfeel

Userfeel is a usability testing platform that provides videos of real users sharing feedback while using your website or app, making it suitable for both experienced researchers and newcomers. However, it has some limitations: results may be delayed, integration options are limited, and more precise tester targeting would improve its usability. Considering these cons, it’s worth exploring alternative options.

Source: Userfeel

Userfeel features

• Mobile Apps Testing
• Prototype Testing
• Card Sorting
• Tree Testing
• 5 Second Testing

Strengths of Userfeel compared to UXtweak

• Userfeel offers testing in 40 languages, while UXtweak supports 14

Weaknesses of Userfeel compared to UXtweak

• Userfeel lacks precise targeting of testers.
• Sharing videos in Userfeel is less efficient.
• Userfeel has delays in receiving test results.

Userfeel pricing

This platform uses Pay-As-You-Go pricing:

• $30: 60-minute unmoderated test with your tester.
• $60: 60-minute moderated test with your tester.
• $60: 20-minute unmoderated test with the Userfeel panel.
• $120: 40-minute unmoderated/moderated test with the Userfeel panel.
• $180: 60-minute unmoderated/moderated test with the Userfeel panel.

Userfeel reviews

Userfeel has a general rating of 4.6/5 on Capterra, while UXtweak scores higher – at 4.8/5.

10. Useberry

Useberry is an online user testing tool that helps UI/UX designers gather feedback through unmoderated testing, session recordings, and heatmaps before development. However, for those seeking more cost-effective and flexible alternatives, platforms like UXtweak offer a better solution.

Source: useberry

Useberry features

• 5-second testing
• Card sorting
• Tree testing
• First click testing

Strengths of Useberry compared to UXtweak

• Useberry offers integration with Adobe XD

Weaknesses of Useberry compared to UXtweak

• Useberry is less cost-effective for startups and small businesses compared to UXtweak.
• Does not support moderated tests
• Lacks a participant management database

Useberry pricing

• Free Plan: 10 responses/month, 1 seat, 1 project.
• Growth Plan: $804/year, 300 responses/month, unlimited projects, and advanced features.
• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing, unlimited responses and seats, with priority support.

Useberry reviews

Useberry has a general rating of 4.4/5 on G2, while UXtweak scores higher – at 4.7/5. 

Conclusion

Unlike many competitors, UXtweak offers flexible pricing, advanced functionalities, and ease of use, making it a cost-effective and reliable choice for businesses of all sizes. With higher user ratings and fewer limitations compared to platforms like UserTesting, Maze, and Hotjar, UXtweak delivers the best overall value for user research and website optimization.

So, what’s the best alternative to UXtweak? The answer is… UXtweak! 🐝